Month: May 2006

All of us have read the Steve Jobs Commencement speech (the one he says that we have to connect the dots backwards). But has anyone read this amazing commencement speech by Richard Feynman (1974 – Caltech). Brilliant in one word, is how I would put it.

An excerpt:

I think the educational and psychological studies I mentioned are examples of what I would like to call cargo cult science. In the South Seas there is a cargo cult of people. During the war they saw airplanes with lots of good materials, and they want the same thing to happen now. So they’ve arranged to make things like runways, to put fires along the sides of the runways, to make a wooden hut for a man to sit in, with two wooden pieces on his head to headphones and bars of bamboo sticking out like antennas–he’s the controller–and they wait for the airplanes to land. They’re doing everything right. The form is perfect. It looks exactly the way it looked before. But it doesn’t work. No airplanes land. So I call these things cargo cult science, because they follow all the apparent precepts and forms of scientific investigation, but they’re missing something essential, because the planes don’t land.

Now it behooves me, of course, to tell you what they’re missing. But it would be just about as difficult to explain to the South Sea islanders how they have to arrange things so that they get some wealth in their system. It is not something simple like telling them how to improve the shapes of the earphones. But there is one feature I notice that is generally missing in cargo cult science. That is the idea that we all hope you have learned in studying science in school–we never say explicitly what this is, but just hope that you catch on by all the examples of scientific investigation. It is interesting, therefore, to bring it out now and speak of it explicitly. It’s a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty–a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you’re doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid–not only what you think is right about it: other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you’ve eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked–to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.

If the above excerpt excited you enough, go check out the entire speech.

[link]

I found this through Seth Godins blog.

Off-topic post:Saw this classic movie on tv last night – Richard Gere at his best. I should say that J-Lo (Jennifer Lopez for the uninitiated) has done a pretty good job too. The two dances their way to glory. The waltzes, the quick steps – wow. They really had done their homework right. I can understand that J-Lo probably learnt dancing – since she dances most times in her music videos – but I bet Richard Gere had to learn a lot of new stuff. Amazing. Ofcourse my fav piece of music was the spanish gypsy dance piece. We used to have this piece as a 45rpm vinyl record once upon a time (we still have the record I think, but we certainly dont have a player.

It was heartening to see that blogger declared my blog as a non-spam blog and qualified me as a human. I will not have to type in those unpronouncable word verification thingies any more.

GC, the human.